Strike 3 Holdings has had a very busy start to the New Year, filing more than 100 new cases across New York, Michigan, Virginia, Maryland, and Illinois. Of these, 10 have been filed in Maryland. Last year, Strike 3 Holdings filed more than 2,000 cases across the country, including approximately 100 in Maryland.
The reason this Plaintiff can file so many lawsuits is because each one is nearly identical and alleges that an overseas investigator recorded an IP address downloading and sharing Strike 3 Holdings’ copyrighted adult films through BitTorrent networks. Strike 3 Holdings owns the rights to the Tushy, Vixen, Blacked, and Blacked Raw brands.
Strike 3 Holdings sues each unnamed internet subscriber as a “John Doe”, identified only through an IP address. It then requests the courts to grant a subpoena compelling the subscriber’s internet service provider (ISP) to provide the customer’s identity. Once identified, Strike 3 Holdings names the subscriber as the Defendant and serves them with a summons. The complaint must be answered in court or the Defendant could face a default judgement against them, which can represent $1,000s in damages per infringement.
Often, a subscriber first discovers the lawsuit when they receive a letter from their ISP notifying them of the subpoena and the date their identity will be released. The letter mentions the possibility to file a Motion to Quash – a formal request to the courts to stop (or “quash”) the subpoena. Motions to Quash are complex in these cases as the subpoena is between the Plaintiff and the ISP, meaning the subscriber is a third party. If a subscriber wishes to remain anonymous, it is important to secure representation early on. This can provide more options to protect your identity and fight the allegations.
These notices are serious. If you do not respond, your ISP is obligated to provide your identity to the Plaintiff, which allows them to serve you with a summons and complaint. Once you are served, you typically have 21 days to respond in Federal court.
For more information on what these lawsuits mean for internet subscribers, please check out our FAQ section.
Many defendants wish to defend anonymously because federal civil lawsuits are generally public record and easily searchable. For those who wish to minimize the suit’s effect on their private and professional lives, it is vital they retain counsel without delay.
If you have received a notice in one of these cases, please don’t hesitate to call me immediately at 888.801.8681. If calling after-hours, please leave a message; I do return calls after-hours.
I have years of experience defending file-sharing lawsuits and can help you achieve the best outcome possible. I have defeated several copyright plaintiffs in lawsuits around the U.S.; I also fought Malibu Media in their first trial. I’ve represented over 600 defendants in both settling and litigating file-sharing lawsuits. I’ve written a subpoena defense guide for your information, as well.
I look forward to speaking with you and helping you put this matter behind you. Please don’t hesitate to call. 888.801.8681.
Yours,
Leonard French
[su_spoiler title=”The 10 new Strike 3 Holdings lawsuits in Maryland are:” style=”modern-orange”][su_list icon=”icon: legal”]
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe case 1:18-cv-04005 filed 2018-12-29
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe case 1:18-cv-04004 filed 2018-12-29
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe case 1:18-cv-04006 filed 2018-12-30
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe case 1:18-cv-04008 filed 2018-12-31
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe case 1:18-cv-04010 filed 2018-12-31
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe case 1:18-cv-04007 filed 2018-12-31
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe case 1:18-cv-04009 filed 2018-12-31
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe case 8:19-cv-00002 filed 2019-01-01
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe case 8:19-cv-00001 filed 2019-01-01
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe case 8:19-cv-00003 filed 2019-01-01
[/su_list][/su_spoiler]