If You’ve Received a Notice from Strike 3 Holdings – Read This
Twenty more households across Illinois, Maryland, and Michigan will be receiving a notice from their Internet Service Provider (e.g., AT&T, Charter/Spectrum, XFinity/Comcast, Verizon, etc.) telling them that Strike 3 Holdings has subpoenaed the internet subscriber’s identity. Who is Strike 3 Holdings? Why do they want your identity? If they file so many cases, can the lawsuits just be ignored?
Strike 3 Holdings owns the rights to the adult film brands Vixen, Tushy, and Blacked. They are notorious for mass-filing lawsuits across the company that allege investigators observed an IP address downloading and sharing the company’s films on BitTorrent networks. Strike 3 Holdings then sues the IP address for copyright infringement.
However, an IP address is merely a unique identifier for an internet connection. In order to find the proper defendant (that is the person that downloaded the files), the Plaintiff subpoenas the Internet Service Provider (ISP) for the subscriber’s identity. Although many judges acknowledge that the subscriber may not be the person who committed the alleged infringements, courts across the country have rubber stamped Strike 3 Holdings’ efforts to identify someone willing to pay a settlement in order to make the lawsuit go away.
Most subscribers find out about the case when they receive a notice from their ISP. The ISP is obligated to comply with the subpoena unless a Motion to Quash is filed. This is a court motion to void or “quash” the subpoena. However, Motions to Quash are complex in these cases as the subpoena is between the Plaintiff and the ISP, meaning the subscriber is a third party. I’m happy to discuss with you whether filing a Motion to Quash or alternative motions is advisable in your case.
For more information on what these lawsuits mean for internet subscribers, please check out our FAQ section.
Although Strike 3 Holdings files thousands of these lawsuits, they are highly motivated to pursue anyone they believe can pay a settlement. Ignoring theses cases is dangerous. If a subscriber fails to respond after they have been served, Strike 3 Holdings can ask for a default judgement (where the court accepts the facts of the complaint as true) and can award thousands of dollars in damages per infringement.
If you’ve received one of these notices or have been served, it’s vital to retain counsel without delay. There are court-imposed timelines that must be adhered to in order to defend yourself. This Plaintiff is notoriously aggressive and an effective defense can help secure the best possible outcome for you.
I’ve defended hundreds of cases against Strike 3 Holdings and similar Plaintiffs, both in negotiating settlements and litigating in court.
I have years of experience defending file-sharing lawsuits and can help you achieve the best outcome possible. I have defeated several copyright plaintiffs in lawsuits around the U.S.; I also fought Malibu Media in their first trial. I’ve represented over 600 defendants in both settling and litigating file-sharing lawsuits. I’ve written a subpoena defense guide for your information, as well. I’m happy to represent clients for both negotiating a settlement and fighting the case in court.
I understand most people haven’t prepared for large, unexpected legal expenses and strive to respect clients’ time and money. I offer flat fees for negotiating settlements to give my clients certainty. I’ve also represented lower income clients both in negotiations and in court and will do my best to work within your means. I’m happy to speak with you to help advise you on what strategy is best in your situation.
I look forward to speaking with you and helping you put this matter behind you. Please don’t hesitate to call. 888.801.8681.
Yours,
Leonard French
[su_spoiler title=”The 7 new Strike 3 Holdings lawsuits in Illinois are:” style=”modern-orange”][su_list icon=”icon: legal”]
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, case 1:19-cv-04278, filed 2019-06-26
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, case 1:19-cv-04281, filed 2019-06-26
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, case 1:19-cv-04302, filed 2019-06-26
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, case 1:19-cv-04303, filed 2019-06-26
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, case 1:19-cv-04304, filed 2019-06-26
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP Address 23.122.161.236, case 1:19-cv-04291, filed 2019-06-26
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP Address 76.255.205.177, case 1:19-cv-04288, filed 2019-06-26
[/su_list][/su_spoiler]
[su_spoiler title=”The 6 new Strike 3 Holdings lawsuits in Maryland are:” style=”modern-orange”][su_list icon=”icon: legal”]
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, case 1:19-cv-01829, filed 2019-06-21
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, case 1:19-cv-01831, filed 2019-06-21
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, case 8:19-cv-01832, filed 2019-06-21
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, case 8:19-cv-01833, filed 2019-06-21
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, case 8:19-cv-01835, filed 2019-06-21
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, case 8:19-cv-01836, filed 2019-06-21
[/su_list][/su_spoiler]
[su_spoiler title=”The 7 new Strike 3 Holdings lawsuits in Michigan are:” style=”modern-orange”][su_list icon=”icon: legal”]
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP Address 108.243.180.242, case 2:19-cv-11931, filed 2019-06-28
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP Address 162.232.90.30, case 2:19-cv-11932, filed 2019-06-28
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP Address 68.43.174.42, case 4:19-cv-11936, filed 2019-06-28
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP Address 68.58.213.9, case 2:19-cv-11937, filed 2019-06-28
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP Address 69.137.219.191, case 2:19-cv-11938, filed 2019-06-28
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP Address 99.7.155.93, case 5:19-cv-11933, filed 2019-06-28
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP Address 75.12.90.42, case 1:19-cv-00518, filed 2019-06-28
[/su_list][/su_spoiler]